promptfoo/examples/adaline-gateway/adaline-structured-output/promptfooconfig.yaml

# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://promptfoo.dev/config-schema.json
description: 'Adaline Gateway Structured Output Example'

prompts:
  - 'Analyze the following customer support query: "{{query}}"'

providers:
  - id: adaline:openai:chat:gpt-4.1-mini
    config:
      seed: 322431
      responseFormat: json_schema
      responseSchema:
        name: customer_support_analysis
        strict: true
        description: 'output schema for analysis of a customer support query'
        schema:
          type: object
          properties:
            query_summary:
              type: string
              description: "A brief summary of the customer's query"
            category:
              type: string
              enum:
                [
                  'billing',
                  'technical_issue',
                  'product_inquiry',
                  'complaint',
                  'feature_request',
                  'other',
                ]
              description: "The main category of the customer's query"
            sentiment:
              type: string
              enum: ['positive', 'neutral', 'negative']
              description: "The overall sentiment of the customer's query"
            urgency:
              type: string
              enum: ['1', '2', '3', '4', '5']
              description: 'The urgency level of the query, where 1 is lowest and 5 is highest'
            suggested_actions:
              type: array
              items:
                type: object
                properties:
                  action:
                    type: string
                    description: 'A specific action to be taken'
                  priority:
                    type: string
                    enum: ['low', 'medium', 'high']
                required: ['action', 'priority']
                additionalProperties: false
            estimated_resolution_time:
              type: string
              description: "Estimated time to resolve the query (e.g., '2 hours', '1 day')"
          required:
            [
              'query_summary',
              'category',
              'sentiment',
              'urgency',
              'suggested_actions',
              'estimated_resolution_time',
            ]
          additionalProperties: false

tests:
  - vars:
      query: "I've been charged twice for my subscription this month. Can you please refund the extra charge?"
    assert:
      - type: is-json
        metric: ValidJSON
      - type: javascript
        value: output.category === 'billing'
        metric: CategoryAccuracy
      - type: javascript
        value: output.sentiment === 'negative'
        metric: SentimentAccuracy
      - type: javascript
        value: parseInt(output.urgency) >= 3
        metric: UrgencyAccuracy
      - type: javascript
        value: output.suggested_actions.length > 0 && output.suggested_actions.some(action => action.action.toLowerCase().includes('refund'))
        metric: ActionRelevance
      - type: llm-rubric
        value: "Does the query summary accurately reflect the customer's issue about being charged twice?"
        metric: SummaryAccuracy

  - vars:
      query: "How do I change my password? I can't find the option in my account settings."
    assert:
      - type: is-json
        metric: ValidJSON
      - type: javascript
        value: output.category === 'technical_issue'
        metric: CategoryAccuracy
      - type: javascript
        value: output.sentiment === 'neutral'
        metric: SentimentAccuracy
      - type: javascript
        value: parseInt(output.urgency) <= 3
        metric: UrgencyAccuracy
      - type: javascript
        value: output.suggested_actions.some(action => action.action.toLowerCase().includes('password'))
        metric: ActionRelevance
      - type: llm-rubric
        value: "Does the query summary accurately reflect the customer's issue about changing their password?"
        metric: SummaryAccuracy

  - vars:
      query: "I love your new feature! It's made my work so much easier. Any plans to expand on it?"
    assert:
      - type: is-json
        metric: ValidJSON
      - type: javascript
        value: output.category === 'feature_request'
        metric: CategoryAccuracy
      - type: javascript
        value: output.sentiment === 'positive'
        metric: SentimentAccuracy
      - type: javascript
        value: parseInt(output.urgency) <= 2
        metric: UrgencyAccuracy
      - type: javascript
        value: output.suggested_actions.some(action => action.action.toLowerCase().includes('feedback'))
        metric: ActionRelevance
      - type: llm-rubric
        value: "Does the query summary accurately reflect the customer's positive feedback and interest in feature expansion?"
        metric: SummaryAccuracy

  - vars:
      query: "Your product is terrible and never works! I want a full refund and I'm cancelling my account!"
    assert:
      - type: is-json
        metric: ValidJSON
      - type: javascript
        value: output.category === 'complaint'
        metric: CategoryAccuracy
      - type: javascript
        value: output.sentiment === 'negative'
        metric: SentimentAccuracy
      - type: javascript
        value: |
          output.urgency === '5'
        metric: UrgencyAccuracy
      - type: javascript
        value: output.suggested_actions.some(action => action.priority === 'high')
        metric: ActionRelevance
      - type: llm-rubric
        value: "Does the query summary accurately reflect the customer's severe complaint and refund request?"
        metric: SummaryAccuracy

derivedMetrics:
  - name: 'OverallAccuracy'
    value: '(CategoryAccuracy + SentimentAccuracy + UrgencyAccuracy + ActionRelevance + SummaryAccuracy) / 5'
  - name: 'ResponseQuality'
    value: '(ValidJSON + OverallAccuracy) / 2'